If you're after the smallest file possible, HEVC Medium beats my custom, excellent-quality H.264 settings in file size (it's 56% smaller) with an encode that took 38% longer. Also, looking at the Efficiency Score (final file size * encoding time) metric, which essentially evaluates the compression efficiency in a lower-is-best fashion, it clearly blows away the competition. It creates a slightly larger HEVC-encoded file than Handbrake's default H.264 settings in under half the time. It's also plainly obvious that the Nvidia HEVC encoder is significantly faster than anything else due to its hardware encoding advantage. Of course this says nothing about quality, which we will explore later, but purely based on this data it's very easy to remove the Faster and Slow presets from contention. Secondly, the x265 Slow preset was enormously slower than the Medium preset, while delivering a very similar file size.
Firstly, the x265 Faster preset was significantly slower than the Ultrafast preset, while actually delivering less compression. Nvidia HEVC: CQP mode at default settingsįor our Game of Thrones test file, there is a lot that can be deduced from the above data.HEVC Slow: x265 Slow Preset, QF 23, default otherwise.HEVC Medium QF 15: x265 Medium Preset, QF 15, default otherwise.HEVC Faster: x265 Faster Preset, QF 23, default otherwise.HEVC Medium: x265 Medium Preset, QF 23, default otherwise.H.264 Handbrake Deafult: x264 Very Fast, Main Profile, Level 4.0, QF 23.H.264 Custom: Settings listed on, QF 23.My personal rig was used for testing, which is equipped with a modest Intel Core i5-3570 quad-core CPU at 3.4 GHz, 16 GB of DDR3 memory, and an Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Throughout the following section, all encodes were made using Handbrake with the settings as mentioned, with the exception of the Nvidia encodes, which were performed using StaxRip. Let's take a look at how the various encodes perform.
0 kommentar(er)
